A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide consideration following an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design is effective at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, search for to develop their spouse and children dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their website, bringing about an encroachment over a Particular Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their setting up permission, and say the wall, which is partly designed, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has because come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and ailments connected towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all performs have been completed dependant on Expert suggestions and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea all through a storm, do not change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Unique Region of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with one another extended after the lawful charges are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. Whether it can ultimately be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will rely on the court’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.